| 
    
 





|

|
POSTCARD FROM CYBERSPACE
SMART BOX VS.
IDIOT BOX
The fear and loathing of the digital video recorder misses
the opportunities
that lie ahead for advertising in a multimedia world, notes Angelo Fernando.
 ere’s
an oxymoronic term you may see pop up soon: ‘adver-blogs’.
It’s one of those things that try to play opposite roles and end
up having very little impact. Adver-blogs, in case you are wondering,
are ads that pretend to be genuine ‘blogs’ (or weblogs). No
different from infomercials in the TV era, I will wager that this odd
marriage of advertising and blogs is not the future of a new era of marketing.
But there is another device that may allow us to peep over the wall into
that future, and it comes to you from TiVo, the chief mischief maker in
television advertising.
First, a quick recap on TiVo and the hullabaloo it has already created.
TiVo introduced the world to the Digital Video Recorder (often referred
to as the DVR), an idea quickly duplicated by other vendors. The DVR,
like the VCR of yore, is a classical ‘disruptive technology’
because of its ability to record programmes off TV and cable, bypassing
the ads. It’s basically a small set-top box with a hard drive, so
it allows someone to store hours and hours of television and then fast-forward
past the ads. TiVo and the time-shifting option it brings is different
from the way VCRs do the same thing, in that it allows a viewer to pause
a live programme in its tracks and view it, say, 15 minutes later. How?
The set-top box is constantly recording the programming, so ‘pausing’
and starting 15 minutes later means watching the saved portion of programme,
off the hard drive. Then, during a commercial break, the viewer can fast-forward
past the commercials, thereby catching up with the broadcast in real time.
Serious TiVo users habitually start watching a two-hour movie about half
an hour after the actual broadcast. By skipping past about two commercial
breaks, they save themselves about 20 minutes of their life! Advertisers
hated it. Ad agencies feared it would make the ‘interruptive’
model of commercials obsolete. But the smart ones are still finding creative
ways – aggressive product placement, for instance – around
this audience power tool.
But there’s a new angle to this story. TiVo is not going to stand
around being branded as an anti-advertiser WMD. That’s why it is
coming up with a new feature called ‘tags’, which are basically
icons or logos that appear even when a commercial is being fast-forwarded.
The purpose? To make the viewer think again about skipping the ads, and
perhaps click on the tag with the remote. (You don’t need me to
point out how similar in function the TV remote is becoming to a mouse…)
I believe this is just round two of the TiVo revolution, cozying up to
advertisers. If round one (being the couch potato’s way to banish
advertising) was the yin, then round two is the yang.
Embedded icons or tags sound great, but there could be more in store.
TiVo certainly knows which side of its bread is being buttered. It already
harvests viewer demographic and usage data that gives ad agencies precise
information about TV audiences – something they always lacked. In
the old days of targeting, the Nielsen rating was the ‘science’
offered as proof to clients for expensive media buys. Nielsen Media Research
tracks information based on diary entries and ‘people meters’
of a sample of the audience. Its data has always been controversial.
In the digital world, the science of data collection can be so good that
it’s almost scary. An advertiser can see, almost in real time, how
many people skip a commercial – or how many go back and watch a
segment of a programme. The famous example: TiVo’s ability to tell
how many times viewers (using TiVo boxes) replayed the Janet Jackson exposed-breast
incident, just minutes after the shocking exposé during the Super
Bowl last year. In case you’re wondering, there was an 180 per cent
increase in the number of times viewers replayed the incident! Last year,
Nielsen partnered with TiVo, so advertisers can expect audience data to
be more fine-tuned.
Ad agencies, if they are thinking far enough, need to start planning for
round three of digital data gathering, when DVR companies will be able
to not just provide data but also act like a medium, a content enhancer
and a marketing ally. Portable DVR units are not far away and could become
as desirable – and tiny – as, say, iPods. These players could
be loaded with software that saves advertising in special formats, not
just as 30-second commercials. The ads could magically appear as sidebars
on a programme or clickable information modules that launch webpages –
perfect for those who may be watching TV on portable ‘tablets’
that are part-PC, part-TV and part-jukebox with MP3 capability.
This form of ‘disruptive’ advertising would have to anticipate
a consumer who will hardly know when he or she is online or offline, watching
live programming or recorded fare, and switch between being in PC mode
and TV mode. Already, research is showing that a growing number of people
are watching TV and surfing the Web simultaneously! TiVo cites another
statistic: up to 20 per cent of viewers, when given an option to ‘participate’
in some form of advertising, will do so. Viewers who actually welcome
ads? An ad-blocking device that encourages viewers to watch and respond
to marketing? Unlike infomercials and other oxymorons such as ‘rap
artist’ and ‘diet ice cream’, the mischievous little
DVR just might serve two masters.
|