PROTECTION AND INVESTMENT
Nalaka Godahewa talks to Namini Wijedasa about increasing awareness
among Sri Lankans on the duality of insurance cover.


 

Q: How would you assess the recent performance of the insurance industry?

A: The industry is completely privatised now and is growing at around 20 per cent. We are performing very well because this is an industry with low penetration. When you compare ours with the insurance industry of a developed country, we are nowhere near reaching our true potential.

In an East-Asian country such as Singapore or Malaysia, insurance penetration is more than 80 per cent. In Sri Lanka, there is only 10 per cent penetration in life insurance and around 15 per cent in general.

 

Q: What is the reason for such low penetration?

A: Obviously, the lack of insurance awareness. Large companies insure. But in suburban or village areas, shops and small businesses don’t necessarily insure because they don’t perceive insurance as a necessity. This is an awareness that comes about with development. In a developed country, most insurance requirements are compulsory. Here, the legal framework is not that strict as yet.

 

Q: How can the industry increase awareness about insurance?

A: We have a regulator, the Insurance Board of Sri Lanka (IBSL), which has become more active recently and has done a good job in the last two to three years. IBSL has a role to play in raising insurance awareness. Insurance companies also have a role to play, particularly the market leaders.

 

Q: Does the industry spend heavily on advertising?

A: Yes, the industry is a relatively high spender because it is competitive. There are 16 players in the market. Everybody wants to grab a share of the potential market, so there is much marketing activity.

 

Q: Are there unfair marketing practices due to high competition?

A: There are always disagreements over what the ethical practice should be. A recent debate in the industry, in which even the IBSL got involved, was to do with advertising ethics. Ethics is not something you can enforce. The advertising industry as a whole has to agree.

The Insurance Act has a very simple guideline, which asserts that one cannot mislead the public. The question, then, is whether or not some companies mislead the public. It’s an ongoing discussion and we have voiced our concerns. A few companies have taken it up with the regulator, too. To my understanding, the regulator has already taken the initiative to write to some of these errant companies, advising them to be cautious.

 

Q: What do you mean by misleading advertising?

A: You make a claim that’s not correct. For example, if I say I can do something for you, but I don’t actually do it for you. Sometimes, I promise to do what can’t be done. I don’t want go into details because I’ll be stepping on somebody’s toes; but if you look around, you will understand what I am saying. If a company claims that it can do something for you and that only it can do so, you may wonder why it is the only one, right?

 

Q: Some customers complain that they have been led to believe that insurance schemes are savings schemes. How would you react to this?

A: That is the truth and that is how it should be communicated. Insurance is a saving, as well. It has two components – protection and investment. The two are combined. You promote insurance, highlighting the need for protection. At the same time, if nothing untoward happens, there’s a return on the policy-holder’s investment, which is better than what he or she would otherwise have derived.

 

Q: But aren’t the returns less than what one would obtain from other investment schemes?

A: I would argue that it varies from product to product. Some insurance products offer much better returns than investments through financial-services companies. Certain products may not offer a high rate of return on investments because they place more emphasis on the protection aspect. The company would usually ask potential policy-holders whether they want more weight on protection or investment.

 

 

Almost everybody has health-care
insurance in developed countries. This
 is not the case in Sri Lanka, where this
 is a product with very low penetration.

 

Q: That sounds good on paper, but isn’t it true that insurance agents don’t usually offer such detailed advice?

A: We are quite concerned about this. The expertise of our insurance advisors is not comparable with the expertise of those in the developed world. This is because, for a long time, not much effort has gone into increasing their awareness of products. What happens, more often than not, is that they know a few products well and they sell those.

The industry is now trying to take insurance advisors to a different level, so they will pursue needs-based selling. With needs-based selling, the agent has to first ask the customer what he or she wants – not merely sell what is available. I think this is already happening to some extent. Meanwhile, some of us are educating people through advertising on what questions to ask an insurance advisor.

 

Q: How does the ‘lapsation rate’ impact on the industry?

A: At the last conference of the National Forum of Life Insurance Advisors, IBSL’s Director-General said that Sri Lanka’s average lapsation rate is 45 per cent. It leaves a bad impression in the market because of the bad experiences of policy-holders.  

The interviewee is the Chief Executive Officer of Sri Lanka Insurance.

To read the entire article, subscribe to LMD – or get your
copy of this widely read business magazine at leading
bookstores and selected retail outlets.

 
     

 
 

LMD – Sri Lanka’s pioneering business magazine – is published by
Media Services (Private) Limited, 59 Ward Place, Colombo 7, Sri Lanka.
Tel: (94 011) 2672017 • Fax: (94 011) 2672019 • Email: lmdmail@lankacom.net
Media Services also publishes LIVING and presents BENCHMARK.


Copyright 1996 – 2007 © Media Services (Private) Limited